Filter

46 results found

DOCX

Meeting minutes - mono

https://intranet.sydney.edu.au/content/dam/intranet/documents/music/committees/Research/2024-scm-research-committee-meetings/4th-march-2024/scm-research-committee---minutes---20240304.docx - 19 March, 2024

SCM RESEARCH COMMITTEE. SCM RESEARCH COMMITTEE. 12.00pm, Monday 4th March 2024. Room 2135 and Zoom. Present: Neal Peres Da Costa (NPDC—ADR, chair); Anthony Chmiel (AC, Executive Officer); Amanda Harris (AH); Benjamin Carey (BC); Michael Duke (MD); Stephanie McCallum (SM); Helen Mitchell (HM); Myfany Turpin (MT); Julia Russoniello (JR —HDR Student Representative). Guests: Paul Mac (PM); Jade Smith (Library Guest, in lieu of SC). Apologies: Chris Coady (CC); Thomas Fienberg (TF); Jakelin Troy

DOCX

FRAMING PAPER Submission To > Date > ...

https://intranet.sydney.edu.au/content/dam/intranet/documents/governance-updates-2024/ue-framing-paper-template.docx - 29 April, 2024

FRAMING PAPER. Submission To. <<Committee Name>>. Date. <<Meeting Date>>. Item No. [UGO use only]. Confidential or Non-Confidential <<delete one>>. Executive Sponsor Comment by Stacy Oon: For papers submitted to University Executive or Senate meetings, this sponsor must be a member of the University Executive. (insert name and position). Paper Title. (insert name of paper). Live Questions. (insert the headline questions you are seeking the Committee’s strategic input into). Recommendation.

DOCX

Advice on responding to enquiries for HDR research for SACE academics on the supervisor register

https://intranet.sydney.edu.au/content/dam/intranet/documents/arts-social-sciences/slam/sace-research/advice-on-responding-to-enquiries-for-hdr-research.docx - 6 May, 2024

Advice on responding to enquiries for HDR research for SACE academics on the supervisor register. This document is for SACE academic staff who are on the HDR supervisor register and may be eligible to take on the role of lead or primary supervisor. Later in the document are examples of responses you can make, depending on whether you want to reject, request more information, agree to help develop the proposal, or support the application and agree to supervise. To get on the register of lead

DOCX

PART 1: RECOMMENDATIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION

https://intranet.sydney.edu.au/content/dam/intranet/documents/teaching-support/curriculum/course-quality-review-template-june-2024.docx - 26 June, 2024

Non-Confidential. Course Review Template. Instructions for Course Directors. The course review template is designed to ensure you capture all information in the review which is required by the University Learning and Teaching Policy and by the Higher Education Standards Framework (HESF) standards which we must meet to maintain our registration with TEQSA. Every section must be completed. You may include an overarching narrative which sets out your vision for the course. This can be a word

DOCX

Centre review self evaluation report

https://intranet.sydney.edu.au/content/dam/intranet/documents/contacts-connections/services/provost/centres-templates-2023/centre-review-self-evaluation-report-all-levels_2023.docx - 22 January, 2024

Review of Centre. Self-Evaluation Report. Introduction. This template should be used for review of level 2-4 centres with reference to the Centres Policy and Centres Procedures. It should be provided, with any attachments, to the Review Panel to aid their review of the Centre. 1. Centre information. Name of Centre:. Level:. Presiding Faculty/Supervising DVC:. Date of establishment/last approval:. Approval expiry date:. Type of review: 5-Year Other (please specify):. Name of Centre’s Director(s

DOCX

Centres review panel report

https://intranet.sydney.edu.au/content/dam/intranet/documents/contacts-connections/services/provost/centres-templates-2023/centre-review-panel-report-all-levels_2023_2024.docx - 18 March, 2024

Review Panel Report. Introduction. This template should be used with reference to the Centres Policy and Centres Procedures 2023. 1. Executive summary. Type of review: 5-Year Other (please specify):. Executive Summary (500 words).. 2. Review panel’s overall recommendation (select one). The Centre should continue unchanged. The Centre should continue with the changes recommended in Section (3). The Centre should be reclassified. The Centre should be closed. Other (please specify). 3.

Pages: