Navigating myResearch Ethics (committee members)
This guide explains how to navigate myResearch Ethics to complete your tasks.
Submit a review via myResearch Ethics (committee members)
This article outlines the process of submitting a standard review in myResearch Ethics.
A standard review is a review of an adverse event or milestone, or a chair review of a resubmitted application/amendment outside of a meeting. It is a simplified review form which does not permit other reviewers to view your comments within the system.
Submit a collaborative review in myResearch Ethics (committee members)
This guide outlines the process for submitting a collaborative review in myResearch Ethics for an application or amendment.
A collaborative review involves reviewing an application or amendment within a meeting, enabling all members to view and contribute to the review comments.
Submit an ethics application in myResearch Ethics
This guide explains how to submit a new ethics application in myResearch Ethics.
If you need to:
- submit an amendment, see 'Submit an amendment to an approved application in myResearch Ethics'.
- resubmit an application/amendment after receiving feedback, see 'Resubmit an application or amendment following feedback in myResearch Ethics'.
Manage view and edit access in myResearch Ethics
This guide explains how to see who has access and share access (view and edit) to an application or project in myResearch Ethics.
Modify your display in myResearch Ethics
This guide explains how to modify your display by customising your columns, sorting and filtering the various sections in the myResearch Ethics system.
Note: you cannot customise your landing page; only the sections accessed via the navigation task bar at the top of screen.
What is the process to obtain IP at USYD?
The Commercialisation Office assists and provides support to University of Sydney staff, affiliates and students in all matters related to creation, protection and commercialisation of intellectual property (IP) at the University. This articles outlines the general steps to obtain IP at the University.
Submit an amendment to an approved application in myResearch Ethics
This guide explains how staff, higher degree research (HDR) students and external applicants can submit a new amendment to an approved application in myResearch Ethics.
- If you need to resubmit an application/amendment after receiving feedback, see Resubmit an application or amendment following feedback in myResearch Ethics.
Any person with edit access to an application may draft an amendment; however, only the Chief Investigator can submit. If you are not the Chief Investigator, you must contact them to complete the task.
You will not be able to create a new amendment if there is already an amendment or response submitted or under review.
What is IP commercialisation?
This article outlines what is intellectual property (IP) commercialisation, purpose of IP commercialisation, and how the Commercialisation Office can assist and guide you through the IP commercialisation process.
How to check or follow-up on a research request in Service Now
This article outlines how to check and/or follow up on the status of a Research request in the Services Portal.
Please refer to the following articles if you want to learn how to:
- Browse and find research support services on the Services Portal
- Contact the Research Portfolio as an affiliate of the university
Important: We recommend always checking the status of and making updates to existing ticket enquiries through the Services Portal. Sending a new email enquiry to research.support@sydney.edu.au or copying in this address to your email correspondence with other parties will always generate new ticket enquiries in the Services Portal and make it more difficult to locate updates to your case.
Research Funding Approval (RFA) Workflow - Process Summary
This article provides a detailed guide on the Research Funding Approval (RFA) process in the pre-award phase, specifically designed for the Faculty of Medicine and Health (FMH) pilot for the following schemes:
- Funding Organisations:
- Heart Foundation
- Postdoctoral Fellowship
- Vanguard Grants
- Heart Foundation
It offers a comprehensive step-by-step workflow for faculty members, researchers, and administrative staff engaged in the grant application process.
Retention periods for research data
Research data must be retained for a minimum period as set out by the State Records Act (NSW) 1998 General retention and disposal authority: higher and further education and research (GA47).
University-supported research data platforms: Features and comparisons
The University provides and supports a suite of different tools to aid with managing your research data. Each of these platforms have specific uses and strengths.
Resubmit an application or amendment following feedback in myResearch Ethics
This guide explains how staff, higher degree research (HDR) students and external applicants can resubmit an ethics application/amendment in myResearch Ethics. You will be asked to resubmit an application/amendment after it has undergone administrative or ethics review.
Tips for completing your human ethics amendment
This article provides tips for completing a good human ethics amendment.
What are 'spin-out' and 'start-up' companies and how do I create one?
This article defines a new venture. also referred to as a 'spin-out' and 'start-up' companies, along with processes to follow when establishing a new venture.
What is the ERA Definition of Research?
Material submitted to ERA (Excellence in Research for Australia) must meet the definition of research.
What is included in the research invoicing automation process?
This article explains when to raise an invoice through the research invoicing automation process.
What are the differences between REDCap and Qualtrics?
Both REDCap and Qualtrics are available to researchers to use to deliver surveys to research participants. However, these two platforms have different strengths and weaknesses. Here is a comparison that may help you decide which platform better suits your needs.
Who has delegated authority in the research domain?
The University of Sydney Delegations of Authority Rule 2020 authorises the holders of identified positions to make final decisions, or take actions, on the University’s behalf in relation to specified activities. You can read more about the Delegations of Authority, including frequently asked questions, on the Strategy & Governance Section of the University intranet page.
Pages: