Skip to main content
Intranet

Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET)

The University is committed to enhancing the student experience by implementing evidence-based evaluation methods that directly inform and support the Teaching and Learning Strategy.

Working with students and staff, and in support of this work, we have developed the Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET) survey. The intention is that this will replace the Unit of Study Survey (USS) after piloting and evaluation.

The SET survey is a refreshed institutional tool designed to gather student feedback on the quality of their learning and teaching experiences at Sydney. It focuses on both the unit and the teaching within it, providing valuable insights into how students perceive the organisation, content, delivery, support, and impact of their coursework.

The survey includes both unit-level and teacher-level questions. It distinguishes betwen quantitative feedback on individual teachers and qualitative feedback on teaching practices across the unit, ensuring feedback remains constructive and focused on enhancing the learning experience.

The SET survey will be: 

  • Consistent and comparable - standardised across the University, combining quantitative (Likert-scale) and qualitative (open-text) questions.
  • Collaboratively designed - co-designed with staff and students to ensure fit-for-purpose questions and protocols that consider potential bias, accountability and confidentiality, and promote constructive and respectful feedback.
  • Phased in - piloted in Semester 2, 2025, expanded pilot in Semester 1, 2026, and rolled out University-wide in Semester 2, 2026.
  • Streamlined - replacing the Unit of Study (USS) and Feedback for Teachers (FFT) survey with an institutional survey to support improvement, decision-making, and recognition of teaching.

Objectives

The SET survey provides data to support continuous improvement in teaching and learning, giving staff meaningful, actionable feedback to inform practice and celebrate outstanding teaching.

It also ensures compliance with our legislative obligations under the Higher Education Standards and supports our strategic goal to become number one in the Group of Eight (Go8) for student satisfaction by 2032. 

Key features

Data alignment and co-design

Through consultation and collaborative design, we are developing fit-for-purpose data sets on units, teaching, and teachers. These data sets will inform cycles of support, continuous improvement, recognition, and reward.

Compliance

We are strengthening the University's current student feedback mechanisms to ensure compliance with TEQSA's Higher Education Standards Framework, which specifies that:

  • Comprehensive reviews of courses of study (programs) are informed and supported by regular interim monitoring, of the quality of teaching, student progress and the overall delivery of units within each course of study.
  • All students have the opportunity to provide feedback on their educational experiences and student feedback informs institutional monitoring, review and improvement activities.
  • All teachers and supervisors have opportunities to review feedback on their teaching and research supervision and are supported in enhancing these activities.
  • Results of regular interim monitoring, comprehensive reviews, external referencing and student feedback are used to mitigate future risks to the quality of the education provided and to guide and evaluate improvements.

Best practice benchmarking

We have identified best practices in student evaluations of units and teaching by examining case studies from other Australian universities and conducting policy and literature reviews.

Data governance and integrity

We are establishing protocols to monitor and share data responsibly, with careful consideration of psychosocial risks, biases, accountability, and confidentiality.

Policy review and enhancement

We are reviewing our Learning and Teaching policy suite, focusing on quality assurance mechanisms for units, teaching, and teachers, with a view to potential amendments.

Student engagement

With the launch of a new student-facing survey platform (Explorance Blue) and ongoing engagement with student leaders we are implementing several student engagement strategies to promote student survey completion, including “closing the loop” with students, reinforcing that their feedback matters.

Further information

The SET project has progressed through two major phases:
  • Conducting a literature review, national policy analysis, benchmarking against GO8 universities, and broad consultation with staff and students.
  • Co-designing the draft survey instrument with University-wide representation. This included multiple iterations, student focus group testing, and exploration of teaching thresholds and reporting practices.

The Academic Board has endorsed the project to move into a pilot of the survey tool in Semester 2, 2025. A selected number of units have been chosen. Participating units will be supported with readiness and debriefing sessions.

Reporting

We are developing guiding principles and a reporting framework to ensure SET reports are released in a timely, transparent, and responsible manner. These will outline expectations for confidentiality, accountability, and communication of outcomes.

Reports will:

  • Be shared with relevant academic and professional staff, Heads of School, and Faculty and University leadership to inform reflection and improvement.
  • Provide aggregated quantitative data and redacted qualitative feedback to ensure individual confidentiality where appropriate.
  • Be supported by guidance and resources to help leaders and teams interpret results effectively and use them to guide conversations constructively.

Teachers who teach more than 30 percent of the overall teaching load of a unit will receive:

  • Reports where there are 5 or more student responses.
  • Quantitative and qualitative feedback on the unit, quantitative feedback on questions specific to your practices in that unit, and qualitative feedback on the students’ perceptions of the overall teaching for that unit.
  • Feedback that has been redacted for inappropriate comments.
  • Support to interpret results effectively and respond to student feedback.

It is anticipated that teachers and teaching teams will draw on the data alongside other evidence for their reflective practice. This may include for Academic Planning and Development (AP & D) discussions aligned with the Academic Excellence Framework, as well as promotion, fellowship and award applications, peer review and engaging students in continuous improvement conversations. The SET survey is also aligned with the Academic Excellence Framework .

SET Survey questions

The SET survey being piloted is for what is being referred to as the “standard” survey, suitable for units comprising lectures, seminars, workshops, tutorials, labs etc. in face-to-face, blended and online modes.

We are working to create an iteration of the survey suited to a range of placement or work-integrated learning settings. It is understood that some courses require specific placement surveys to meet accreditation requirements.

The survey questions are being evaluated as part of the Semester 2 pilot, with ongoing testing to ensure clarity, relevance, and impact.

Once the survey instrument has been finalised, incorporating feedback from staff, students, and other stakeholders, the final version will be shared in advance of its broader implementation across the University.

The survey will be one source of feedback among a broader suite of evaluative tools to support the continuous improvement of teaching and learning across the University. It is designed to generate meaningful, standardised data on students’ perceptions of both unit quality and teaching effectiveness, aligned with the University’s strategic priorities and TEQSA standards.

The intention is that the survey will replace the USS. Following a period of robust testing and refinement, the new SET survey is expected to replace the current USS for relevant units. Once finalised, we will distribute the SET survey directly to students through the new survey platform (Explorance Blue) offering a streamlined and more user-friendly experience.

This transition aims to reduce duplication, enhance the quality of feedback collected, and ensure that the data gathered is more targeted, actionable, and aligned with the University’s strategic priorities.

We recognise the potential for unconscious bias particularly related to gender, culture, and other personal characteristics.

To address this, we are implementing several key measures:

  • Purposely designed survey questions: The questions focus on observable teaching behaviours and learning experiences, rather than personal traits.
  • Redaction of inappropriate comments: Open-text responses will be monitored and redacted where comments are inappropriate, offensive, or discriminatory, ensuring that teaching staff are not exposed to harmful remarks.
  • Ongoing analysis of feedback patterns: As part of the continuous improvement process, we will monitor for patterns of bias in student responses and refine processes, communications and reporting accordingly.
  • Part of broader approach to feedback: Importantly, the SET survey is just one tool within a broader suite of feedback mechanisms used to support and evaluate teaching quality. It should not be used in isolation, but rather considered alongside other forms of peer review, self-reflection, and institutional data to ensure a balanced and comprehensive view of teaching effectiveness.

The survey design also helps to minimise opportunities for bias by focusing qualitative questions on teaching and learning across the unit rather than on individual teachers.

Students are not asked to provide open-text (qualitative) feedback about individual teachers.

While the survey includes quantitative questions where students rate aspects of teachers (such as how well prepared or supportive the teacher was), the open-text questions are designed to capture reflections on teaching and learning across the unit as a whole.

This approach helps keep feedback constructive, respectful, and centred on improving the learning  experience.

Inappropriate or personal comments will be redacted before results are shared with staff.

The survey questions include a blend of Likert-scale responses, two open-text questions related to the overall unit and teaching perceptions, and two faculty-specific quantitative questions. The Blue platform also provides ‘Help Text’ to clarify each question’s intent, helping students understand whether they are responding about the unit as a whole or specific aspects of teaching.

The survey design recognises that some units may have only one teacher who undertakes all teaching – lectures, seminars, workshops, tutorials etc. In these cases, the teacher will be the focus of both the quantitative and qualitative responses. 

Engagement

Staff and students were part of the Co-Design Team and Advisory Group throughout December 2024 – June 2025 supporting Phase 2, helping define the purpose, structure, and content of the draft survey instrument and associated protocols.

We held targeted student focus groups to test early iterations of the survey. These sessions provided valuable feedback on the clarity, length, tone, and engagement level of the questions, ensuring they were accessible and meaningful from a student perspective.

Student leaders’ insights were also periodically sought.

Throughout the SET Project, University governance groups have provided input and intermittent endorsement. We have also briefed leadership groups across Faculties and University Schools and relevant communities of practice.

The SET survey will be distributed directly to students, via email, through the new survey platform, Explorance Blue. This platform offers a more streamlined and user-friendly experience, allowing students to complete the survey easily on desktop or mobile devices.

The first pilot of the SET survey will run in Semester 2, 2025, for selected units in the Faculty of Medicine and Health.

We are running our first pilot in November 2025 with three selected units in the Faculty of Medicine and Health.

Some key activities are:

  • Survey period: 6 November to 20 November.
  • Release of results / reporting: December.
  • Feedback conversations with teaching team: December.
  • Unit coordinators and teaching staff focus group session with project team: To be confirmed.